As any prominent awards ceremony approaches, you'll find a clamor for introducing of new categories to recognize overlooked contributions and satisfy the passions of fans dedicated to specific genres.
A fellow writer previously argued supporting a scary games classification. That would be fantastic. So would strategy board titles, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward since similar to blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument supporting my request stands as crucial and significant. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.
Categorizing Game Types
Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and typically spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why film award organizations steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise within the realm of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.
For comprehensive acknowledgment of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.
Current Gaming Award Categories
Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include classifications covering Action, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these six categories effectively encompass many game types, and you can find room for numerous titles.
This doesn't apply to brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears to accommodate them. Consider three of outstanding current releases, all very different: the architectural riddles in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition in a different title, engaging interpersonal challenges from additional release. Which classification works between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.
Recognition Challenges
There are dozens excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit award groups including Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, or the intensely contested Indie races.
- A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated in any category in 2014
- Another imaginative release received no nominations that year
- Well-received sorting experience got ignored that year
- Only a few puzzle games scraped into niche award types
Value of Brain-Teasers
These are often modest productions, however the design in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among the most-played games worldwide maintaining this status for an extended period.
The famous puzzle experience competes with popular creative games for the title of most purchased experience; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Puzzle games are foundational to the art of video games, while interacting across multiple categories.
Proposal and Rationale
Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter this problem. It would be easy to populate a field of five interesting, varied, worthy titles annually without trouble — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude so many good games out.
To emphasize again, these are games lacking appropriate categories in important events. Puzzle game makers operate at the demanding boundary of video game design, creating some of most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Similar to cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. We shouldn't delay generations.
